It has been greater than 13 years for the reason that finish of the final main America’s Cup litigation in 2010. Regrettably, the world’s oldest ongoing worldwide sport continues to be but to recuperate from the results of that litigation with fewer rivals competing for the Cup since. Is there a greater strategy to resolve competitor disputes when there are not any agreements in place to arbitrate, with out the danger of once more damaging this historic sport? The Deed of Reward governing the competitors, with out evaluation or argument has been assumed by litigants and the New York courts, to create a New York-based charitable belief. Nearly all of the New York Court docket of Appeals of their Mercury Bay judgment of 1990 questioned this characterisation in a short footnote, however since then the New York courts have continued to depend on the identical assumption, in line with the bulk, just because “none [of the Mercury Bay] of the litigants have raised it”. This paper critiques the Deed and finds it affected by authorized deficiencies that maybe name into query the Deed’s standing as a authorized doc and as a charitable belief. These deficiencies additionally increase the query of whether or not the mid-nineteenth century Donors of the Cup had authorized intent however maybe meant a gents’s settlement, binding solely in honour, moderately than at regulation to be enforced within the civil courts? The paper additionally explores how the Donors meant competitor disputes are to be resolved and finds that there’s a dispute decision provision hidden inside the phrases of the Deed, which is prone to be in the perfect pursuits of the game, if it have been to be to utilized, instead of litigation in a courtroom.